Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.7/706
Title: Transcriptomic comparison between two Vitis vinifera L. varieties (Trincadeira and Touriga Nacional) in abiotic stress conditions
Author: Rocheta, Margarida
Coito, João L
Ramos, Miguel J N
Carvalho, Luísa
Becker, Jörg D
Carbonell-Bejerano, Pablo
Amâncio, Sara
Keywords: Grapevine
Field Conditions
Controlled Conditions
Microarray
Gene expression
Varietal diversity
Issue Date: 12-Oct-2016
Publisher: BioMed Central
Citation: Rocheta, M., Coito, J. L., Ramos, M. J. N., Carvalho, L., Becker, J. D., Carbonell-Bejerano, P., Amâncio, S. (2016). Transcriptomic comparison between two Vitis vinifera L. varieties (Trincadeira and Touriga Nacional) in abiotic stress conditions. BMC Plant Biology, 16(1), 224.
Abstract: Predicted climate changes announce an increase of extreme environmental conditions including drought and excessive heat and light in classical viticultural regions. Thus, understanding how grapevine responds to these conditions and how different genotypes can adapt, is crucial for informed decisions on accurate viticultural actions. Global transcriptome analyses are useful for this purpose as the response to these abiotic stresses involves the interplay of complex and diverse cascades of physiological, cellular and molecular events. The main goal of the present work was to evaluate the response to diverse imposed abiotic stresses at the transcriptome level and to compare the response of two grapevine varieties with contrasting physiological trends, Trincadeira (TR) and Touriga Nacional (TN).
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.7/706
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-016-0911-4
Publisher Version: http://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12870-016-0911-4
Appears in Collections:PG - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016).pdfmain article1,16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM1.pdfsupplementary materials 1223,67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM2.pdfsupplementary materials 263 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM3.xlsxsupplementary materials 314,33 kBMicrosoft Excel XMLView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM4.pdfsupplementary materials 4157,71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM5.pdfsupplementary materials 5302,04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM6.pdfsupplementary materials 6290,43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM7.xlsxsupplementary materials 719,45 kBMicrosoft Excel XMLView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM8.pdfsupplementary materials 831,65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM9.pdfsupplementary materials 9141,57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM10.pdfsupplementary materials 10453,03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Amancio_BMC.Plant.Biol.(2016)_SM11.xlsxsupplementary materials 1113,1 kBMicrosoft Excel XMLView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.