Loading...
Research Project
Collective Computation and Control in Complex Biochemical Systems
Funder
Authors
Publications
Adaptive developmental plasticity: Compartmentalized responses to environmental cues and to corresponding internal signals provide phenotypic flexibility
Publication . Mateus, Ana; Marques-Pita, Manuel; Oostra, Vicencio; Lafuente, Elvira; Brakefield, Paul M; Zwaan, Bas J; Beldade, Patrícia
The environmental regulation of development can result in the production of distinct phenotypes from the same genotype and provide the means for organisms to cope with environmental heterogeneity. The effect of the environment on developmental outcomes is typically mediated by hormonal signals which convey information about external cues to the developing tissues. While such plasticity is a wide-spread property of development, not all developing tissues are equally plastic. To understand how organisms integrate environmental input into coherent adult phenotypes, we must know how different body parts respond, independently or in concert, to external cues and to the corresponding internal signals.
Canalization and control in automata networks: body segmentation in Drosophila melanogaster
Publication . Marques-Pita, Manuel; Rocha, Luís M.
We present schema redescription as a methodology to characterize canalization
in automata networks used to model biochemical regulation and signalling. In
our formulation, canalization becomes synonymous with redundancy present in the
logic of automata. This results in straightforward measures to quantify
canalization in an automaton (micro-level), which is in turn integrated into a
highly scalable framework to characterize the collective dynamics of
large-scale automata networks (macro-level). This way, our approach provides a
method to link micro- to macro-level dynamics -- a crux of complexity. Several
new results ensue from this methodology: uncovering of dynamical modularity
(modules in the dynamics rather than in the structure of networks),
identification of minimal conditions and critical nodes to control the
convergence to attractors, simulation of dynamical behaviour from incomplete
information about initial conditions, and measures of macro-level canalization
and robustness to perturbations. We exemplify our methodology with a well-known
model of the intra- and inter cellular genetic regulation of body segmentation
in Drosophila melanogaster. We use this model to show that our analysis does
not contradict any previous findings. But we also obtain new knowledge about
its behaviour: a better understanding of the size of its wild-type attractor
basin (larger than previously thought), the identification of novel minimal
conditions and critical nodes that control wild-type behaviour, and the
resilience of these to stochastic interventions. Our methodology is applicable
to any complex network that can be modelled using automata, but we focus on
biochemical regulation and signalling, towards a better understanding of the
(decentralized) control that orchestrates cellular activity -- with the
ultimate goal of explaining how do cells and tissues 'compute'.
Control of complex networks requires both structure and dynamics
Publication . Alexander J. Gates; Luis M. Rocha
The study of network structure has uncovered signatures of the organization
of complex systems. However, there is also a need to understand how to control
them; for example, identifying strategies to revert a diseased cell to a
healthy state, or a mature cell to a pluripotent state. Two recent
methodologies suggest that the controllability of complex systems can be
predicted solely from the graph of interactions between variables, without
considering their dynamics: structural controllability and minimum dominating
sets. We demonstrate that such structure-only methods fail to characterize
controllability when dynamics are introduced. We study Boolean network
ensembles of network motifs as well as three models of biochemical regulation:
the segment polarity network in Drosophila melanogaster, the cell cycle of
budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the floral organ arrangement in
Arabidopsis thaliana. We demonstrate that structure-only methods both
undershoot and overshoot the number and which sets of critical variables best
control the dynamics of these models, highlighting the importance of the actual
system dynamics in determining control. Our analysis further shows that the
logic of automata transition functions, namely how canalizing they are, plays
an important role in the extent to which structure predicts dynamics.
Modularity and the spread of perturbations in complex dynamical systems
Publication . Kolchinsky, Artemy; Gates, Alexander J.; Rocha, Luis M.
We propose a method to decompose dynamical systems based on the idea that
modules constrain the spread of perturbations. We find partitions of system
variables that maximize 'perturbation modularity', defined as the
autocovariance of coarse-grained perturbed trajectories. The measure
effectively separates the fast intramodular from the slow intermodular dynamics
of perturbation spreading (in this respect, it is a generalization of the
'Markov stability' method of network community detection). Our approach
captures variation of modular organization across different system states, time
scales, and in response to different kinds of perturbations: aspects of
modularity which are all relevant to real-world dynamical systems. It offers a
principled alternative to detecting communities in networks of statistical
dependencies between system variables (e.g., 'relevance networks' or
'functional networks'). Using coupled logistic maps, we demonstrate that the
method uncovers hierarchical modular organization planted in a system's
coupling matrix. Additionally, in homogeneously-coupled map lattices, it
identifies the presence of self-organized modularity that depends on the
initial state, dynamical parameters, and type of perturbations. Our approach
offers a powerful tool for exploring the modular organization of complex
dynamical systems.
Organizational Units
Description
Keywords
Contributors
Funders
Funding agency
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Funding programme
3599-PPCDT
Funding Award Number
PTDC/EIA-CCO/114108/2009