Is Diagnosability an Indicator of Speciation? Response to "Why One Century of Phenetics Is Enough"

Heller, R.; Frandsen, P.; Lorenzen, E. D.; Siegismund, H. R.

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.7/567

Use this identifier to reference this record.

Name:	Description:	Size:	Format:
Helleretal_Is diagnosability an indicator of speciation_2014.pdf	artigo principal	353.32 KB	Adobe PDF	Download

Send Feedback

Authors

Abstract(s)

Recently (Heller et al. 2013; H&A), we commented on a revision of the bovid taxonomy, which proposes a doubling in the number of recognized species (Groves and Grubb 2011; G&G). The subsequent response by Cotterill et al. (2014; C&A) contains a number of misunderstandings and leaves much of the critique voiced in our paper unanswered, focusing instead on species ontologies and taxonomic history. C&A argue strongly against phenetics, morphospecies, and taxonomic conservatism, ascribing us views that we do not hold and hence confusing the substance of our disagreement. These misconceptions oblige us to clarify our views on certain key issues to avoid being misrepresented. More seriously, however, the authors fail to respond to, or acknowledge, some of our crucial practical concerns, notably the risk of taxonomic inflation (Isaac et al. 2004) posed by their diagnostic phylogenetic species concept (dPSC). Here, we restate a number of our concerns regarding the proposed bovid taxonomy of G&G and discuss their treatment in C&A.

Keywords

Animals Ruminants Genetic Speciation

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.7/567

Citation

Rasmus Heller, Peter Frandsen, Eline Deirdre Lorenzen, and Hans R. Siegismund Is Diagnosability an Indicator of Speciation? Response to “Why One Century of Phenetics Is Enough” Syst Biol (2014) 63 (5): 833-837 first published online May 15, 2014 doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu034