CBTM
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing CBTM by Issue Date
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Asymmetric neurogenic commitment of retinal progenitors involves Notch through the endocytic pathwayPublication . Nerli, Elisa; Rocha-Martins, Mauricio; Norden, CarenDuring brain development, progenitor cells need to balanceproliferation and differentiation in order to generate different neurons in the correct numbers and proportions. Currently, the patterns of multipotent progenitor divisions that lead to neurogenic entry and the factors that regulate them are not fully understood. We here use the zebrafish retina to address this gap, exploiting its suitability for quantitative live-imaging. We show that early neurogenic progenitors arise from asymmetric divisions. Notch regulates this asymmetry, as when inhibited, symmetric divisions producing two neurogenic progenitors occur. Surprisingly however, Notch does not act through an apicobasal activity gradient as previously suggested, but through asymmetric inheritance of Sara-positive endosomes. Further, the resulting neurogenic progenitors show cell biological features different from multipotent progenitors, raising the possibility that an intermediate progenitor state exists in the retina. Our study thus reveals new insights into the regulation of proliferative and differentiative events during central nervous system development.
- Asymmetric neurogenic commitment of retinal progenitors is regulated via the Notch endocytic pathwayPublication . Nerli, Elisa; Rocha-Martins, Mauricio; Norden, Caren
- Stochasticity and determinism in cell fate decisionsPublication . Zechner, Christoph; Nerli, Elisa; Norden, CarenDuring development, cells need to make decisions about their fate in order to ensure that the correct numbers and types of cells are established at the correct time and place in the embryo. Such cell fate decisions are often classified as deterministic or stochastic. However, although these terms are clearly defined in a mathematical sense, they are sometimes used ambiguously in biological contexts. Here, we provide some suggestions on how to clarify the definitions and usage of the terms stochastic and deterministic in biological experiments. We discuss the frameworks within which such clear definitions make sense and highlight when certain ambiguity prevails. As an example, we examine how these terms are used in studies of neuronal cell fate decisions and point out areas in which definitions and interpretations have changed and matured over time. We hope that this Review will provide some clarification and inspire discussion on the use of terminology in relation to fate decisions.